Assignment #2: Group curricular micro-teaching lesson plan and slides

By -

Comments

  1. Susan GerofskyOctober 15, 2019 at 7:17 PM

    Thanks Danielle, Wanyi and Anwar! Your lesson plan is OK, but I have a few suggestions as well:
    • The 4-minute video is cute, but it doesn't seem to add much that's really helpful from my point of view. It is mostly procedural/ mnemonic (how to and procedures) rather than promoting deeper relational understanding. Is it really worth taking up 1/3 of your lesson?
    •Much of your lesson is a recap of procedures. What is new in what you are teaching the group?
    •I'm not clear from the slides or the lesson plan exactly what the problems are that you are asking your class to solve. The problems on the slides seem to include the solutions already.

    Think it over, and see if you can make some small tweaks to the lesson to make it clear what is new and what you would like the students to engage in. (And if you want to use the video, go for it -- just think about what it might add to the students' knowledge, attitudes, etc.)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog Reading - Thinking of Math Textbooks

By -
Here is an interesting critical-thinking take on the ways that math textbooks may 'speak to' their readers (assuming that people actually do read and listen to math textbooks...) Wagner & Herbel-Eisenmann on math textbooks and the ways they may position their readers Please read this thought-provoking article and blog on: •How you respond to the examples given here -- as a teacher and as a former student •What are your thoughts about the reasons for using/ not using textbooks, and the changing role of math textbooks in schools? The author gave an example that TMM's initial "investigation" whose instruction included much more exclusive imperatives (or "scribbler" imperatives such as "write", "calculate" and "copy" ) than inclusive imperatives ("thinker" imperatives like "describe", "explain", "prove"). I agree that it is appropriate to scribble before thi...
Read more

Reading & response: From Indigenous mathematician Ed Doolittle

By -
Doolittle (2018) Off the grid. In S.Gerofsky (Ed.)  Geometries of liberation.  New York: Palgrave, pp. 101-121. Please read this very interesting piece and write a blog post on it by Sunday, December 8 at 8:00 PM. Suggested prompts: Talk about 2 or 3 'stops' you had in reading this: things that stopped you, surprised you, etc. Think about how this paper might offer new approaches to Indigenizing mathematics curriculum and teaching. Does it challenge or stretch any of your ideas around this? The author questions the grid concept "We know well the benefits of using the grid, but what are the  dangers? What are the preconditions for the grid which may not be satisfied in real-world applications? What are the extremes at which the grid can  fail? What are the consequences of failure? And what are the alternatives?" This questioning process makes me think of the development of Non-Euclidean geometry which also starts from questioning the truth of Euclid's 5...
Read more

The scales puzzle

By -
My first though is to figure out 4 numbers from 1 to 40 that can be added together to obtain any whole numbers from 1 to 40. So, one of the 4 weights must be 1g, which is the smallest weight. Should the next be 2g? There is only one whole number can be obtained by combining 1g and 2g, which is 3g. What about 3g? The combinations of 1g and 3g give us 2 whole numbers, which are 2g (3g-1g) and 4g (1g+3g). What about 4g? But any combination of 1g and 4g won't give me 2g. Now, 1g and 3g are the two of the 4 weights in my mind. And using a similar pattern, I figure out 9g is one of the 4 weights: Combination of 1, 3, 5: 3-1=2 3+1=4 5-1=4 5-3=2 Obviously, 5g is not a choice since numbers obtained by combining 1,3 and 5 can be obtained by combinations of 1 and 3 as well. New numbers produced by combining 1, 3 and 6 6-1=5 6+1=7 6+3+1=10 Now we have 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 and 10 New numbers produced by combining 1, 3 and 7 7+3=10 7-1=6 7+1=8 7+3+1=11 7+3-1 7+1-3 Now we have 1...
Read more